🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect women from abuse, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and heated discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a major regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 people have endorsed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority support, the head of state could potentially return the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect similar discussions in other member states